top 5 wednesday: Books Without Romance

July 5th: Books Without Romance

I love this topic. I’ll admit, I haven’t been crazy about the shipping topics lately. I’m not much of a romantic.  Here are some of my favorite romance-less books:



And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie: The queen of mystery does indulge in some romantic subplots every now and then, but not here. And Then There Were None tells the story of ten strangers, all of whom have been issued a mysterious invitation to an island a mile or so off the English coast. Then one by one, they start to be murdered. The most recent BBC adaptation actually throws in a romantic subplot, but it’s not present in the original novel, which is about as devoid of romance as anything can be.


Penance by Kanae Minato: This Japanese thriller follows the aftermath of a horrible event in the lives of four young women.  One day in the summer of fourth grade, five girls go out to play and one of them, Emily, is murdered.  Although there are some relationships in the background of this novel, none of these are the focus.  I actually don’t remember the male characters in this story at all – the focus is all on the women, Emily’s mother in particular, who blames the remaining girls for the death of her daughter and who threatens them to either find the murderer before the statute of limitations is up or perform an act of penance, lest she take revenge on them.

29034Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose: This is a play which takes place entirely in a courtroom.  Twelve men are on the jury for a case which at a glance appears to be simple – a young boy stands accused of murdering his father, and there are several witnesses to testify.  Eleven out of the twelve men are in favor of a guilty verdict, but one lone dissenter, Juror 8, advocates for an open discussion which slowly begins to illuminate cracks in the case.  Romance is absolutely the last thing on the agenda in this story, which is at once a fascinating character study and an even more fascinating meditation on the flaws in the U.S. judicial system.

51xhgjvwgvl-_sx322_bo1204203200_Six Stories by Matt Wesolowski: Told in the format of a podcast, Six Stories is about the investigation of a twenty year old murder.  By interviewing people who knew the victim, 15-year-old Tom Jeffries, investigative journalist Scott King attempts to recreate the circumstances of his mysterious death as comprehensively as possible.  Although there are some accounts of teenage relationships in these pages, this novel is devoid of any romance or sentimentality – it’s a rather cold yet compelling account of the dynamics of the friend group that Tom Jeffries had been a part of.



An Imaginary Life by David Malouf: This is a short and incredibly moving little book, in which David Malouf gives a fictionalized account of the final years of the poet Ovid, which he lived out in exile.  Malouf tells a strange and unconventional story about Ovid forming a relationship with a child who’s grown up in the wilderness, without human contact.  As Ovid doesn’t speak the language of the characters around him, there isn’t any romance here – just a rather fascinating and intelligent look at human nature and isolation.

So what are some of your favorite books without romance?  Comment and let me know!

11 thoughts on “top 5 wednesday: Books Without Romance

    • I’d never seen it or read it until about a month ago – I read the play and then watched the movie right after and I loved them both. I can’t believe I’d never seen it before!

      Liked by 1 person

      • It’s a fantastic adaptation! Really, really faithful, but with good enough performances that it never felt boring, even already knowing how it would turn out.

        I have to say I preferred reading the play just because there’s something to be said for letting your imagination do some of the legwork, and I’m actually better at names/numbers than faces, so weirdly enough I was better able to follow the character progression of ‘Juror #3’ while reading it than memorizing who’s who in a black and white film with a bunch of generic looking white men. If that makes sense??

        Liked by 1 person

      • Totally makes sense. I got a bit lost with each character in the film too! Glad to hear it’s a good adaptation.

        My stepdad probably has the book at home because he loves the film so much so I will have to root through the shelves!

        Liked by 1 person

    • Agreed. I was a fan of most of the changes they made – especially the way the murderer was revealed as it made more sense for the medium – but the romance was clearly just an excuse to get Aidan Turner and Maeve Dermody’s shirts off. It was so pointless.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I completely agree. The climax, if anything, was better in the adaptation, in that it worked much better visually. It’s a shame they pandered to the need for romance/sex scenes though, as we so rarely get books with a mixed cast of men and women (especially classics) without some kind of romantic subplot.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Ugh, totally. And as long as they were inventing plotlines, they could have actually had a gay relationship – especially since they changed Blore’s crime, so making that character gay could have been interesting, like his crime was driven from internalized homophobia… I mean, that’s just one idea. They could have done anything. Instead we just get the pretty straight white couple – how riveting.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s