book review: The Girl in the Ice by Robert Bryndza

28233082

THE GIRL IN THE ICE by Robert Bryndza
★★☆☆☆
Grand Central Publishing, 2016

Well, I can’t say I get the hype surrounding this one.

The Girl In The Ice follows DCI Erika Foster, who’s recently been reinstated to the police force after a failed mission which resulted in the death of her husband. She’s investigating the death of young socialite Andrea Douglas-Brown, whose body was found in a frozen pond in London. Much tedium ensues. I guess I wouldn’t describe The Girl In The Ice as a slog, but it wasn’t exactly a page-turner, either. Especially thanks to a totally unnecessary conflict between Erika and her boss, which results in Erika being sidelined from the investigation and then spending many chapters just waiting for people to call her back and keep her updated. This book was so much longer than it needed to be because of this subplot.

Anyway, interspersed with Erika’s perspective are chapters from the point of view of the murderer, who is referred to (presumably in an effort to hide their gender?) solely as ‘the figure.’ It’s alright the first time Robert Bryndza does it, but then it just gets weird. “The figure watches Erika. She steps toward the window. The figure retreats. I want to kill her, muses the figure.” (That’s not a real quote, but it basically could be.) I mean, why wouldn’t you just write these chapters in first person?? Or use a gender neutral ‘they,’ or eliminate these kind of pointless chapters altogether, or just… do anything to avoid having to resort to ‘the figure’??

Which brings me to my main complaint with this book: the writing was startlingly, inexcusably bad. I obviously don’t read thrillers for their literary merit, but we’re almost verging into ‘how did this get published’ territory with lines like:

“‘DCI Sparks. I have just been to the crime scene and there are things…’ started Erika.

‘I said, I’m now in control of this crime scene and I’m ordering you to step aside!’ shouted Sparks, losing it.”

And that’s not even to mention the murderer’s eloquent declaration:

“‘You think you can analyze me. Rationalize what I did, why I killed? I did it because I CAN.'”

Yes, that’s a real quote.

When you have to put the book down during the big climactic scene because you’re laughing too hard, that’s never a good sign.

There’s one element of this book that I thought I was going to love – the criticism of how the investigation into Andrea’s death wasn’t being conducted properly in order to preserve the rich family’s decorum (e.g., Erika isn’t allowed to announce in a press conference the name of the shady bar where Andrea was last seen, because it would look bad for the family to be associated with a place like that). The problem is, it quickly becomes so heavy-handed, and no matter how much I agree with a message, I don’t like it being shoved in my face. You can never go wrong with crediting your readers with a bit of intelligence.

Thank you to Netgalley, Grand Central Pub, and Robert Bryndza for the copy provided in exchange for an honest review.

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “book review: The Girl in the Ice by Robert Bryndza

  1. “I don’t get the hype,” said Rachel, losing it.

    Sorry, couldn’t resist. But that dialogue though…

    I’m totally with you on having different standards of literary merit for certain genres, but it’s a shame when an outright poorly written thriller becomes the next ‘big hit’. Is it asking too much for a thriller to be both exciting and to have decent writing? 😫

    Liked by 1 person

    • LOL oh my god I could have had so much fun writing a review parodying that terrible dialogue. Alas.

      I totally agree, admittedly I can be a huge literary snob but when it comes to thrillers I’m usually a pretty easy date. But my god, this writing. “I do it because I CAN” was followed by this zinger:

      “But you can’t, [name redacted]. You won’t get away with it. There will be consequences.”

      facepalm emoji x infinity

      Liked by 1 person

      • Oh god, I know. I’d do it for free with books like this because I’d consider it doing the world a service, lol. It’s almost insulting when you see writing this poor in published fiction, when you consider how many people with considerably more talent as writers and editors are unable to find work.

        Like

      • Yes, drives me mad too. Started a book a few months ago which I put down after three pages – which is pretty unusual for me – because I spent those three pages rewriting almost every paragraph in my head, and that boded very ill…

        Liked by 1 person

      • That sounds like a good call! The only thing worse than reading an awful book is spending a long time with an awful book because you’re trying to rewrite it in your head the whole time (definitely been there too).

        Liked by 1 person

    • I wish I could say I preferred reading positive reviews, but I’d definitely be lying. There is something so fun about reading and writing a good rant, and a book like this is just begging for it. That dialogue!!!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s